<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>euicho.com &#187; stephen king</title>
	<atom:link href="http://euicho.com/tag/stephen-king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://euicho.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 04:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen King on Harry Potter</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/stephen-king-on-harry-potter/</link>
		<comments>http://euicho.com/2007/stephen-king-on-harry-potter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>euicho</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books, Movies, Music, and TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen king]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen King has written a great piece about Harry Potter, the series end, and how no reviewer has done it justice. It is a great article (DOES contain spoilers, which he explains) and I strongly recommend you read it! EW.com by way of HPANA.com Jo Rowling set out a sumptuous seven-course meal, carefully prepared, beautifully [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen King has written a great piece about Harry Potter, the series end, and how no reviewer has done it justice. It is a great article (DOES contain spoilers, which he explains) and <a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20044270_20044274_20050689,00.html">I strongly recommend you read it</a>!</p>
<blockquote><div class="source"><a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20044270_20044274_20050689,00.html">EW.com</a> by way of <a href="http://hpana.com/">HPANA.com</a></div>
<div>Jo Rowling set out a sumptuous seven-course meal, carefully prepared, beautifully cooked, and lovingly served out. The kids and adults who fell in love with the series (I among them) savored every mouthful, from the appetizer (Sorcerer&#8217;s Stone) to the dessert (the gorgeous epilogue of Deathly Hallows). Most reviewers, on the other hand, bolted everything down, then obligingly puked it back up half-digested on the book pages of their respective newspapers.</div>
<div class="brtop">And because of that, very few mainstream writers, from Salon to The New York Times, have really stopped to consider what Ms. Rowling has wrought, where it came from, or what it may mean for the future. The blogs, by and large, haven&#8217;t been much better. They seem to care about who lives, who dies, and who&#8217;s tattling. Beyond that, it&#8217;s all pretty much duh.</div>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://euicho.com/2007/stephen-king-on-harry-potter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

