<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panorama fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:04:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camera Collector</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-38661</link>
		<dc:creator>Camera Collector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 10:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=221#comment-38661</guid>
		<description>I really admire that model of camera. They say a good photo is not due to how good the camera is, but the skill of the photographer, but just the same, I still suspect that I could be a better photographer if I bought one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really admire that model of camera. They say a good photo is not due to how good the camera is, but the skill of the photographer, but just the same, I still suspect that I could be a better photographer if I bought one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5226</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=221#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>wow o wowee those are sweet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow o wowee those are sweet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euicho</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5203</link>
		<dc:creator>euicho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=221#comment-5203</guid>
		<description>lol you noticed him too huh? I was wondering if Doody had see.. GAH! *gak* *gurble*....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol you noticed him too huh? I was wondering if Doody had see.. GAH! *gak* *gurble*&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 05:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=221#comment-5191</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the phantom doody in the downtown pic, thats creepy.  Uh oh I think he&#039;s behind me oh god...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the phantom doody in the downtown pic, thats creepy.  Uh oh I think he&#8217;s behind me oh god&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5144</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 23:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=221#comment-5144</guid>
		<description>Wow, you have saved me hours or research. Thank You.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you have saved me hours or research. Thank You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euicho</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>euicho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=221#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>Thanks Luke!

The Carl Zeiss Sony cameras are very good. Mine is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_reviews/f717.html&quot; title=&quot;Steves Digicams F717&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sony F717&lt;/a&gt; though it is 5 years old and only 5MP, it has very high quality (Carl Zeiss) glass in it. When we decided to look for a camera for Amme, she wanted a very compact one with a big screen, good mega pixel count, and good photo quality. We decided on the Sony DSC W50, which also uses Carl Zeiss glass. It takes really crisp photos. Both these have proprietary batteries, but even my 5 year old battery holds a charge just fine, and only cost $25 for a backup battery. I suggest getting the Sony if you can get it for $200 or less. Other than that I, choosing a camera depends on what you are looking for, ie: number of mega pixels, zoom, do you want an ultra-compact or do you care about size? etc. I suggest going to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steves-digicams.com/&quot; title=&quot;Steves Digicams&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Steves Digicams&lt;/a&gt;, this place is my bible for cameras, and click on either &quot;The Best Cameras&quot; which will give you the best cameras for each category, or hover over the &quot;Our Reviews&quot; button and select a mega pixel range. This will give you a matrix of cameras and features so you can narrow down the camera that is perfect for you. For good cameras in general for around $200, here are a few options:
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For really huge zoom in a slim package, check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/s10.html&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nikon s10&lt;/a&gt;. Its got a bad-ass swivel lens and amazing zoom, and has 6 mega pixels.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For a nice sturdy high-zoom with high photo quality, see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/sp510.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Olympus SP-510&lt;/a&gt;. Its bigger than the Nikon S10 but has 1.1 more mega pixels, and while they have the same size (2.5 inch) LCD, the SP-510 has a traditional viewfinder, while the Nikon s10 does not.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/a560.html&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Canon Powershot A560&lt;/a&gt; has 7 mega pixels, 4x zoom, and a 2.5 inch LCD, and while it is not a &quot;pocket&quot; camera, its got a ton of great features at only $180. It also has a viewfinder and the review says it has fine quality glass. If you don&#039;t get the sony, and don&#039;t want more than 4x zoom, this may be the one for you.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Luke!</p>
<p>The Carl Zeiss Sony cameras are very good. Mine is a <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_reviews/f717.html" title="Steves Digicams F717" rel="nofollow">Sony F717</a> though it is 5 years old and only 5MP, it has very high quality (Carl Zeiss) glass in it. When we decided to look for a camera for Amme, she wanted a very compact one with a big screen, good mega pixel count, and good photo quality. We decided on the Sony DSC W50, which also uses Carl Zeiss glass. It takes really crisp photos. Both these have proprietary batteries, but even my 5 year old battery holds a charge just fine, and only cost $25 for a backup battery. I suggest getting the Sony if you can get it for $200 or less. Other than that I, choosing a camera depends on what you are looking for, ie: number of mega pixels, zoom, do you want an ultra-compact or do you care about size? etc. I suggest going to <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/" title="Steves Digicams"  rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Steves Digicams</a>, this place is my bible for cameras, and click on either &#8220;The Best Cameras&#8221; which will give you the best cameras for each category, or hover over the &#8220;Our Reviews&#8221; button and select a mega pixel range. This will give you a matrix of cameras and features so you can narrow down the camera that is perfect for you. For good cameras in general for around $200, here are a few options:</p>
<ul>
<li>For really huge zoom in a slim package, check out the <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/s10.html"  rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Nikon s10</a>. Its got a bad-ass swivel lens and amazing zoom, and has 6 mega pixels.</li>
<li>For a nice sturdy high-zoom with high photo quality, see the <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/sp510.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Olympus SP-510</a>. Its bigger than the Nikon S10 but has 1.1 more mega pixels, and while they have the same size (2.5 inch) LCD, the SP-510 has a traditional viewfinder, while the Nikon s10 does not.</li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/a560.html"  rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Canon Powershot A560</a> has 7 mega pixels, 4x zoom, and a 2.5 inch LCD, and while it is not a &#8220;pocket&#8221; camera, its got a ton of great features at only $180. It also has a viewfinder and the review says it has fine quality glass. If you don&#8217;t get the sony, and don&#8217;t want more than 4x zoom, this may be the one for you.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/panorama-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5133</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=221#comment-5133</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom.
Those panoramas are pretty cool. I&#039;d figure I ask you this. I&#039;m looking for a digital camera what would be good for under $200? I saw a Sony with a Carl Zeiss lens with a 7 mega pixel res. but it  has an internal rechargeable battery. So I come dumbfounded to you.

-Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom.<br />
Those panoramas are pretty cool. I&#8217;d figure I ask you this. I&#8217;m looking for a digital camera what would be good for under $200? I saw a Sony with a Carl Zeiss lens with a 7 mega pixel res. but it  has an internal rechargeable battery. So I come dumbfounded to you.</p>
<p>-Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

