<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 300 Wikipedian Friends of Cat Trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://euicho.com/2007/300-wikipedian-friends-of-cat-trees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://euicho.com/2007/300-wikipedian-friends-of-cat-trees/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doody</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/300-wikipedian-friends-of-cat-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>Doody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=207#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>Good to hear that your break went well, and sorry that its already over.  As far as Wikipedia is concerned I am sort of for the idea of having editors log in, but I still think that the beauty of the Wikipedia world is that it can be edited by anyone who chooses.  I actually think that by actually almost forcing people to use their critical thinking skills is a good thing.  Someone who is able to note a clear bias or factual issue has proven that they know how to research something correctly and then can change the entry based on further work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear that your break went well, and sorry that its already over.  As far as Wikipedia is concerned I am sort of for the idea of having editors log in, but I still think that the beauty of the Wikipedia world is that it can be edited by anyone who chooses.  I actually think that by actually almost forcing people to use their critical thinking skills is a good thing.  Someone who is able to note a clear bias or factual issue has proven that they know how to research something correctly and then can change the entry based on further work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://euicho.com/2007/300-wikipedian-friends-of-cat-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-4211</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://euicho.com/?p=207#comment-4211</guid>
		<description>damn wiki vandals! 
i&#039;m surprised they don&#039;t force login for editors, everwhere else forced people to register but no no of course the one site that could really use it doesn&#039;t hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn wiki vandals!<br />
i&#8217;m surprised they don&#8217;t force login for editors, everwhere else forced people to register but no no of course the one site that could really use it doesn&#8217;t hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
